Ditto!
That’s all I can say when I read Veritus Group’s blog articles.
Ditto!
These guys (Richard Perry and Jeff Schreifels) totally ‘get’ it!
For instance, today Richard wrote:
“A non-profit should not view each function of fundraising (acquisition, cultivation, mid-level, events, major giving, planned giving) as separate, siloed functions – but rather as a pipeline, where donors come in at the beginning and are nurtured and transitioned in a manner that helps them realize their full giving potential.
Looking at it this way means that everything that happens with the donor is strategically and relationally knitted together to create a major gift pipeline since the end objective is to serve a donor’s passions and interests in a manner that encourages them to give to their potential.”
Brilliant!
This was presented in the second of a series of articles about how you and your leaders should think about major gifts.
I highly recommend you subscribe to their free content.
>>14 things you must know about your donors to win major gifts
>>6 of the biggest reasons why you don’t get enough major gifts from people with capacity
If you’ve read our other posts about LinkedIn, you understand that the point of your…
When we conduct our Vital Signs Assessment, looking for indicators of fundraising success or struggle…
For the most part, everyone agrees that metrics are good. Accountability is good – even…
"Where do we find donors?" I'm asked that question quite a bit. To begin, let's…
FUNDRAISE SMARTER, NOT HARDER: How to Leverage Automation for Optimal Results May 8, 2024, at…
Prospect research, RFM, wealth screeners, and other hands-off/arm’s-length methods of donor discovery can only work…