Categories: Planned Giving

Why looking at response rates for planned giving campaigns is a rookie mistake.

Have you ever sold your home?

If so, how many buyers did you need?

Just one right?

So if you put your house up for sale and your real estate agent sent out thousands of postcards promoting your property, would you be concerned about the “response rate”?

Probably not.

Why?

Because, your home would probably sell for several hundred thousand dollars and you’re looking for a single buyer.   So do you worry about response rates or, rather, do you worry about generating solid leads for highly qualified buyers?

I bet you’d look for solid leads and highly qualified buyers.

The same applies to planned giving marketing.  These are big deals.  So, when your planned giving marketing effort only garners a .0001% response rate, don’t make  a rookie mistake by focusing on that.  Instead, focus on the quality of the leads.

Greg Warner

Share
Published by
Greg Warner

Recent Posts

Fundraising’s Worst Oversimplification

Fundraising's worst oversimplification is: “People give because they’re asked.” That’s like saying those who agree…

5 hours ago

What Gift Officers Should Put in Their LinkedIn Experience Section

If you’ve read our other posts about LinkedIn, you understand that the point of your…

2 days ago

The Most Important Fundraising Metric: The 20-Year Relationship

When we conduct our Vital Signs Assessment, looking for indicators of fundraising success or struggle…

1 week ago

Why Organizations That Institute the Greatest Demands for Accountability Perform So Poorly

For the most part, everyone agrees that metrics are good. Accountability is good – even…

1 week ago

Don’t Just “Find” Donors; Build Relationships for Lasting Impact

"Where do we find donors?" I'm asked that question quite a bit. To begin, let's…

2 weeks ago

FREE Webinar: Fundraise Smarter, Not Harder: How to Leverage Automation for Optimal Results

FUNDRAISE SMARTER, NOT HARDER: How to Leverage Automation for Optimal Results May 8, 2024, at…

2 weeks ago