A lot of charities tout the fact that they take care of their own.
Marines helping marines!
Cancer patients helping cancer patients!
And so on.
But could doing so be a misguided marketing strategy?
Research from a study published in December 2014 showed that compassion for distress actually became reduced among people who have “been there.” In other words, according to the study, having ‘been there’ doesn’t necessarily mean you care.
At MarketSmart, we’ve seen this among our clients’ results. Donors who never served in the military have been more likely to give bigger donations and even make planned gifts when compared with armed forces retirees. Family members and friends of cancer patients have been more likely to give, make bigger gifts and leave planned gifts when compared with the patients themselves..
Our evidence is anecdotal of course.
Frankly, I hadn’t even thought about it much until I read this study. Then I began to realize that, perhaps, the empathy gap should be considered while selecting donors for outreach and engagement.
Could it be true that the people who experienced the same hardship as those now needing donations might be less likely to respond to requests for support?
What do you think? What have you found in your efforts?
>> A Bit of Empathy Might Be the Best Marketing Strategy
>> Empathy Vs. Perspective…Which One is Better?
Fundraising's worst oversimplification is: “People give because they’re asked.” That’s like saying those who agree…
If you’ve read our other posts about LinkedIn, you understand that the point of your…
When we conduct our Vital Signs Assessment, looking for indicators of fundraising success or struggle…
For the most part, everyone agrees that metrics are good. Accountability is good – even…
"Where do we find donors?" I'm asked that question quite a bit. To begin, let's…
FUNDRAISE SMARTER, NOT HARDER: How to Leverage Automation for Optimal Results May 8, 2024, at…