Not as many people give according to our “strategic pillars” as we would like to believe or as our fundraising reports suggest. In fact, we make a mistake in setting up gift accounting systems according to those pillars in the false belief that most people will give according to what we want. That is proving increasingly less true.
When people give for other purposes than those we have offered, we make them fit into our accounting categories, looking for the closest approximation between what we wanted them to do and what they actually did. Sometimes our interpretations prove to be highly creative. Unfortunately, that means we may have failed to accurately record the difference between what we wanted and what donors wanted actually gave to and, therefore, to make the necessary market adjustments in subsequent fundraising efforts.
While we may have recorded the why of giving in the profiles of the major donors, we don’t acknowledge the blocs of why among larger groups of donors. If we have recorded the deep why of major gifts, we can be nurturing stewards and thereby turn a gift into an enduring, mutually satisfying partnership. But if we fail to record the deeper why of groups of first-time donors and modest givers (who might be quite generous within their means), we fail to steward those groups in our institutional response and reports and we miss the opportunity to come alongside them in a way that will leave them feeling represented by our organizations.
Distinct donor blocs may include:
Our inability to recognize these blocs means that we:
The only way to reverse this trends to conduct follow up interviews or surveys shortly after gifts are made to ask why and identify distinct groupings – which can become communities within our larger community if we acknowledge their existence and respond in ways they find rewarding and meaningful.
Jim Langley is the president of Langley Innovations. Langley Innovations provides a range of services to its clients to help them understand the cultural underpinnings of philanthropy and the psychology of donors and, with that knowledge, to develop the most effective strategies and tactics to build broader and more lasting communities of support. Jim has authored numerous books including his most recent book, The Future of Fundraising: Adapting to New Philanthropic Realities, published by Academic Impressions in 2020.
There’s a chasm in major gifts fundraising. It lies between the wealthy donors who often…
Fundraising's worst oversimplification is: “People give because they’re asked.” That’s like saying those who agree…
If you’ve read our other posts about LinkedIn, you understand that the point of your…
When we conduct our Vital Signs Assessment, looking for indicators of fundraising success or struggle…
For the most part, everyone agrees that metrics are good. Accountability is good – even…
"Where do we find donors?" I'm asked that question quite a bit. To begin, let's…