We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Privacy Overview
Login
Your Role
Challenges You Face
results
Learn
Resources
Company
Top 3 reasons why major gift or legacy gift officers don’t have enough meetings with donors
I hear a lot of people complaining about gift officers not meeting with enough donors.
Usually, these complaints come from people who don’t really do much face-to-face fundraising on their own. Instead, interestingly, they manage people who do.
But sadly, they fail to realize that the top reasons why their staff are not meeting with enough donors face-to-face is because either:
- They failed to hire the right people for the job in the first place
- They failed to provide them with highly qualified leads
- They failed to train them on how to set appointments
So, if you’re one of the complainers, ask yourself if you have the right staff or did you hire the first warm body that came through the door and promised to do the job? I know, hiring is a pain in the ass. But if you do it right, most of your other problems go away.
Ask yourself, are you providing them with highly qualified leads or are you telling them to generate their own leads? Most fundraisers are not very good at generating leads. If you mention it to them, they look at you funny. They tend to be focused on ‘outbound’ not ‘inbound.’ That’s old-school and it has got to change. You should be generating and providing them with highly qualified leads. If you aren’t, contact us!
And ask yourself, have you trained them properly on how to set appointments? Too many face-to-face fundraisers suck at this, but they are great at building relationships and closing gifts. Don’t make them do the stuff they suck at! Hire someone else to do it or train them properly!
By the way, I’ve never met anyone in the sector who can explain how to do this well. Sad, isn’t it? Most leaders and consultants in the sector simply have no idea how to set appointments. If you don’t either, you owe it to your staff to learn how or invest in some training.
Bottom line: If they are failing and you are their boss, it’s actually your fault. Have a nice day!
Related Resources:
- Webinar: Scheduling Visits is Scary…but it doesn’t have to be that way.
- 3 simple ways fundraisers can improve their LinkedIn profiles to land more meetings and raise more money
- Do you really need more gift officers to raise more money?
LIKE THIS BLOG POST? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW AND/OR SHARE IT WITH YOUR PEERS!
Get the book!
Feeling like your job is getting harder because donor expectations have changed and competition for the charitable dollar is growing?
Finding that the old orthodoxies and conventions espoused by so-called experts in online echo-chambers and at conferences don’t work anymore?
Want to help more people make impact by facilitating their acts of philanthropy but feel like too many obstacles keep getting in your way?
Then this book is for you.
Engagement Fundraising was developed from the perspective of a donor who discovered firsthand that the impersonal, spray-and-pray approaches of his beloved charity were not only offensive but also wasteful and ineffective. So he took action. And now, you can too.
Get smarter with the SmartIdeas blog
Subscribe to our blog today and get actionable fundraising ideas delivered straight to your inbox!
Agree on all points. However, how many visits (per month, per year) is sufficient. I believe that this depends on a lot of factors, but most of my colleagues say that the emphasis on personal visits outweighs effective moves management, especially when the begin their work at the given nonprofit. For me, the goal is 12 per month. May I ask what others metric is for visits?
Hi Art-
You’re wise to ask this. I think the most important metric is ‘quality’ as measured by movement through the consideration process. Management likes to look at the number of visits but 12 weak visits with unqualified supporters is much worse than one, single amazingly meaningful visit with a hyper-passionate, uber-qualified philanthropist.
Quality over quantity!!
Also, focusing on where they are in the consideration process is essential. It’s not about YOUR moves, it’s about the donors’. In other words, if you meet with 12 supporters who are ready to take action, that’s much better than 12 who are in the discovery stage.
I hope that makes sense.
Again, quality over quantity.
Makes perfect sense, Greg! Thanks!!!!
Art
Great post today Greg! I don’t want to over simply this but the number of visits a development director makes doesn’t necessarily indicate success. The quality and depth of the relationship with the donor is what i believe is the biggest predictor of success. I have some donors I speak with or see monthly and others I only see once or twice a year. I am as successful with both bc it is based on what their level of interaction needs to be to stay connected. Of course they receive letters and an occasional news updates. That is a givien. But some folks would actually stop taking my calls if I pushed myself on them to make some sort of “quota”. The dollars raised is the best metric I use for anyone on my team.
Always…. quality vs. quantity Kendall. Thanks for subscribing to my blog!