Gone are the days – or so they should be:
Of imagining in splendid isolation what donors should do for us then foisting our brain children on the unsuspecting
Of polishing the pitch to wow them into philanthropic submission rather than listen our way into alignments of interest
Of cultivating rather than collaborating from the outset
Of stroking egos rather than stoking philanthropic fires
Of executing moves rather comparing notes
Of putting on shows rather than fostering “insider-ship”
Of closing gifts rather than coming to partnership terms
Of stewarding just by thanking rather than providing progress reports
The times demand more enlightened practice informed by a more considerate vocabulary, more authentic give-and-take, and more open, collaborative frameworks for addressing issues of common concern.
Jim Langley is the president of Langley Innovations. Langley Innovations provides a range of services to its clients to help them understand the cultural underpinnings of philanthropy and the psychology of donors and, with that knowledge, to develop the most effective strategies and tactics to build broader and more lasting communities of support. Jim has authored numerous books including his most recent book, The Future of Fundraising: Adapting to New Philanthropic Realities, published by Academic Impressions in 2020.
There’s a chasm in major gifts fundraising. It lies between the wealthy donors who often…
Fundraising's worst oversimplification is: “People give because they’re asked.” That’s like saying those who agree…
If you’ve read our other posts about LinkedIn, you understand that the point of your…
When we conduct our Vital Signs Assessment, looking for indicators of fundraising success or struggle…
For the most part, everyone agrees that metrics are good. Accountability is good – even…
"Where do we find donors?" I'm asked that question quite a bit. To begin, let's…